Publication date: August 25, 2026

The development of the Polish investment support system began in the mid-1990s, when Special Economic Zones (hereinafter referred to as SEZs) were established under the Act of 20 October 1994. According to Article 2 of this Act, the system was limited solely to designated, uninhabited areas of the territory of the Republic of Poland, where business activity could be conducted on preferential terms. However, a real breakthrough in this approach occurred in 2018 with the entry into force of the Act on Supporting New Investments. This introduced a completely new model – the support system was no longer limited to closed sectors. The resulting Polish Investment Zone effectively recognized the entire territory of Poland as a single large area where entrepreneurs could apply for aid for new projects. The primary support tool in both regimes remained the income tax exemption. In this respect, the Acts refer directly to the Corporate Income Tax Act of 15 February 1992 (CIT Act) – and in particular to Article 17, paragraph 1, item 34 (regarding exemptions within SEZs) and Article 17, paragraph 1, item 34a (regarding new investments within PSIs). We are currently at a key, transitional moment in this evolution. The historical SEZ system has a strictly defined expiry date – it will expire irrevocably at the end of 2026, giving way only to new regulations. This study outlines the framework for this transformation, from the zones being phased out to the current challenges and simplifications in the investment support system.

More

Publication date: July 24, 2026

Analysis of key changes for business managers

We have analyzed the proposed changes to criminal procedure, which introduce a new structure for conducting proceedings, moving away from the current, restrictive model. The foundation of the amendment is the liberalization of regulations and the strengthening of procedural guarantees for suspects, which is a direct response to the need to implement EU directives and restore the adversarial standard.

More

Publication date: July 07, 2026

The Act amending the Act on the National Cybersecurity System aims to implement Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 (NIS Directive 2) and the partial application of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1366 of 11 March 2024 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

The amendment to the KSC Act significantly expands the scope of the regulations and introduces new obligations in the field of cybersecurity management. The changes include, among other things, the implementation of risk management systems and expanded incident reporting requirements. The new regulations also strengthen the powers of supervisory authorities and significantly increase the maximum amount of financial penalties. It also introduces liability for the management staff (manager) of an entity. In practice, this requires certain entities to take steps to comply with the new regulations.

More

Publication date: July 07, 2026

At the outset, it should be emphasized that the regulation relating to witnesses in the Act of 29 August 1997, the Tax Ordinance, is laconic.

If a decision is made to take evidence by questioning a witness, the party must be notified of the place and time of the hearing at least seven days in advance. The parties may participate and ask questions during the hearing (Article 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure).

The doctrine defines a witness as someone possessing knowledge of facts relevant to the case that the tax authority is attempting to reconstruct for the purposes of the proceedings. According to the commentary on the Tax Ordinance, a witness in tax proceedings can be either a person present at an event and thus relying on their personal observations, or one who obtained information indirectly, most often from other people.

More

Publication date: May 13, 2026

In the practice of commercial law, an event often occurs in which the legal status of one entity directly impacts the stability and functioning of another. A particular example is the bankruptcy of a shareholder in a commercial company. Although from a legal perspective, the bankruptcy of a shareholder affects their personal assets, in practice it undermines the very foundations of the company’s operations. Shares or stocks, previously part of a stable ownership structure, become part of the bankruptcy estate, over which the trustee assumes control. For the company, this means entering into a relationship with a new, compulsory “shareholder”, whose actions may be fundamental to the company’s future development. Some of the most important information regarding bankruptcy proceedings that a company may wish to obtain includes whether and when the trustee intends to liquidate the shares and who will exercise corporate rights at shareholder meetings. Despite such obvious interdependencies, a commercial company rarely has the formal status of a party to its shareholder’s bankruptcy proceedings. This situation creates a significant conflict between the principle of open court proceedings and the debtor’s privacy. Therefore, it is necessary to consider whether the commercial company has the right to access the bankruptcy case files concerning the shareholder.

More